Why I trust the Bible
First, let me open
by saying I cannot “prove” to you that the bible can be trusted. However, I am
going to show you some evidence of why I believe the bible to be the true,
inspired word of God, and why I trust it. I am going to start off with going
over a little bit of the history and the transmission of the bible and how closely
it has been copied over the years; then I will discuss the inspiration of the
Bible from God, and lastly touch on the fact that the bible is historically
accurate as far as what is mentioned in it. I will wrap all of this up by
saying just how this collection of writings should impact our lives, if we
believe it to be truth.
The Old Testament
was written by 30 different men over a period of about 1,700 years (2100 BC –
400 BC). Now, we no longer have any of the original autographs from these men,
but through looking at the old manuscript copies of these books, we can see the
consistencies, and piece together what the originals most likely said.
Now, for many
years the complete Old Testaments we had were based off of copies of manuscripts
known as the Masoretic Texts, which were copied around A.D. 900. That means
that the closest copies we had were separated by approximately 1,300 years, if
not closer to 3,000 years! These manuscripts were the best witness we had of
the OT until 1947 when a shepherd boy stumbled
upon what we now call the Dead Sea Scrolls. Over the next 9 years the Dead Sea
Scrolls were slowly discovered in 11 different caves near the Dead Sea. 200
manuscripts (in part and whole) of the Old Testament were discovered, and in
those were parts of every book from the OT with the exception of Esther. The
manuscripts from this discovery pushed the date of the earliest discovered
manuscripts back by 1,000 years (A.D. 900-125 B.C.)! When someone compared a
scroll of Isaiah for the Dead Sea Scrolls to the Masoretic Isaiah scroll
(separated by a gap of 1,000 years), there was only found a 5% difference
(which mostly consisted of spelling differences and clear slips of the pen).
So, if manuscripts could be copied so perfectly over a 1,000 year period
between the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Masoretic texts, then it is probably
fairly safe to assume that the Dead sea scrolls where fairly accurate copies of
the originals.
So far I have only
touched on the Old Testament, but now we will shift our attention to the New
Testament. The New Testament was written by 10 men over about a 50 year time
span (A.D. 40’s-90’s). The closest copies we have today of these 27 books have
been dated to about 100-125 years after the originals were written. So, the opportunity
for the copies to be messed up through years of copying is reduced tremendously
by having such a small gap. In fact, some of the New Testament manuscripts
copies we have may, in fact, be copies of copies of the originals! We have many
more copies of the NT than we do of the OT. We currently have discovered about
5,746 manuscripts (fragments, portions, complete books and a few almost entire
copies of the New Testament. Whereas the Iliad, by Homer, only has about
643 copies, with a time gap of about 400 years.
I feel as though I
have covered my first point fairly well, but what good does having accurate
copies do, if the originals are not inspired by God? This then brings me to
point number two: The inspiration of the Bible.
Inspiration of the Bible means that
God was responsible for overseeing the communication His Word to us, to make
sure it wasn’t touched by man’s imperfections.
The Orthodox view of this is – The Bible IS the Word of God. Now, this
does not apply to the copies, but rather ONLY to the originals. As for the
copies, they are inspired only in as much as they perfectly mimic the
originals. Many of the writers of the Bible claim the inspiration from God (2
Sam 23:2, Rev 22:18-19). “Thus says the Lord” is quoted by the Prophets over
400 times in the Old Testament alone! Not only do these men claim inspiration
for themselves, but they also refer to each other’s words as “of God” (2 Peter
3:15, 1 Kings 2:3, Zech 7:12, John 10:34-35). Jesus even quotes the Old
Testament as though it is from God (Matt 4:4 & 7, Acts 1:16, Matt 19:4-5,
Acts 3:18 & 21, Matt 5:17-18). In 2 Peter 1:20 (NIV) it says, “20
Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the
prophet's own interpretation.” Peter
understood that the words of the prophets were not merely their own
interpretation of what God had said, but rather it was the actual Word of God. Even
Josephus, who was from Bible times and who was not inspired, saw that those who
wrote the Bible was esteemed with authority,
It is true, our
history has been written since Artaxerxes very particularly, but
Has not been esteemed of the like
authority with the former by our forefathers,
because there has not been an exact succession of prophets since that
time;
I
don’t know about you, but personally if someone who lived shortly after the
prophets saw that they had something different about them, then I am going to
have to say that I agree.
If I left us there, with the bible
manuscripts we have today being fairly accurate to the original inspired Word
of God, then what? What about physical evidence? Well, there is some of that.
Historically the Bible has so much backing it up.
In Genesis 6, the
Bible talks about God sending a flood on the earth, but the Bible is not the
only thing that records a story of a flood. In almost every culture and country
the world people have some version of a flood story. To name a few places, West
Asia and Europe, Sumerian, Babylonian, Irish, Finnish, Africa, India, Central
Asia/Turkestan, China, Korea, Malaysia, Australia, Polynesia, Hawaii, North
America, Canari, Inca, Mapuche, and
many more.
For many years
people believed that the Hittites mentioned in the Bible (Gen 15:20, Exodus 3:8
& 17, Numbers 13:29…) were merely a made up people group. Yet, towards the
end of the 19th century, many Hittite monuments were uncovered in Syria
on the Euphrates river, proving the Bible right.
Comments
Post a Comment